Simple reading · Open the interactive atlas

Holy Icons

Catechumen Module

Icons confess that the invisible Word truly became visible flesh. They are not idols, magical objects, or attempts to contain the divine essence. Honor shown to the image passes to the person depicted, while worship belongs to God alone.

Why it matters

Icon theology protects the reality of the Incarnation and teaches Christians to see creation as capable of bearing and revealing grace.

Historical context

The iconoclast controversy forced the Church to articulate the relation between image, prototype, Incarnation, and worship. Nicaea II (787) defended veneration of icons and distinguished it from the worship due to God.

Pastoral note

This module supports parish catechesis; it does not replace the guidance of the priest or catechist responsible for a person's reception into the Church. Local disciplines and preparation practices belong to the parish and bishop.

Memory hook

Because the Word became flesh, the human face of Christ may be depicted and honored.

Learning objectives

Essentials

Common questions

Practice and discussion

Fathers and witnesses

Scripture

Primary sources

John of Damascus writes:

John of Damascus grounds the defense of images in God's true Incarnation.

But after God in His bowels of pity became in truth man for our salvation, not as He was seen by Abraham in the semblance of a man, nor as He was seen by the prophets, but in being truly man, and after He lived upon the earth and dwelt among men, worked miracles, suffered, was crucified, rose again and was taken back to Heaven, since all these things actually took place and were seen by men, they were written for the remembrance and instruction of us who were not alive at that time in order that though we saw not, we may still, hearing and believing, obtain the blessing of the Lord. But seeing that not every one has a knowledge of letters nor time for reading, the Fathers gave their sanction to depicting these events on images as being acts of great heroism, in order that they should form a concise memorial of them.

— St. John of Damascus, An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith (Book 4, Chapter 16), trans. E. W. Watson and L. Pullan

Passage context and translation

John grounds Christian depiction in the historical Incarnation before distinguishing veneration of an image from worship owed to God.

Before the excerpt

Therefore to give form to the Deity is the height of folly and impiety.

After the excerpt

Often, doubtless, when we have not the Lord's passion in mind and see the image of Christ's crucifixion, His saving passion is brought back to remembrance

Watson and Pullan translation in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Volume 9; the displayed excerpt contains the consecutive Incarnation-and-images argument in IV.16.

The council anathematizes the claim:

Nicaea II explicitly rejects treating sacred images as gods.

Anathema to those who say that Christians resort to the sacred images as to gods.

— Second Council of Nicaea, Definition of Faith (Concluding anathemas), trans. Henry Percival, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Volume 14

Passage context and translation

The council's definition distinguishes reverence given to an icon from worship reserved for the divine nature. A similar but differently worded sentence earlier on this page belongs to Basil of Ancyra's confession, not the council's definition.

Before the excerpt

Anathema to those who call the sacred images idols.

After the excerpt

Anathema to those who say that any other delivered us from idols except Christ our God.

Percival translation in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Volume 14; wording is from the anathemas following the council's Definition of Faith.

Sources and further reading

Related records

Open Orthodox Journey in the interactive atlas

All records