Simple reading · Open the interactive atlas

Apollinarianism

Doctrinal Controversy

Classical Protestant confessions preserve the full humanity of Christ, not merely a body animated by the divine Word.

Historical context

Apollinarius of Laodicea developed his account while defending Christ's unity against Arianism. Pro-Nicene theologians judged that removing the human mind made Christ's humanity incomplete and therefore made the healing of human thought, freedom, and obedience incomplete as well.

Reception

Classical Protestant confessions retain the complete humanity of Christ as essential to the historical gospel and atoning work.

Memory hook

The healer assumes the whole human person.

Key points

Common questions

Doctrinal connections

Scripture

Primary sources

Gregory of Nazianzus writes against Apollinarianism:

Gregory argues that whatever Christ did not assume would not be healed.

For that which He has not assumed He has not healed; but that which is united to His Godhead is also saved.

— St. Gregory the Theologian, Letters: To Cledonius the Priest Against Apollinarius (Epistle 101), trans. Charles Gordon Browne and James Edward Swallow

Passage context and translation

Gregory rejects Apollinarianism by insisting that the Word assumed the fullness of human nature, including a human mind.

Before the excerpt

If anyone has put his trust in Him as a Man without a human mind, he is really bereft of mind, and quite unworthy of salvation.

After the excerpt

If only half Adam fell, then that which Christ assumes and saves may be half also; but if the whole of his nature fell, it must be united to the whole nature of Him that was begotten, and so be saved as a whole.

Browne and Swallow translation in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Volume 7; surrounding excerpts come from the linked Epistle 101 paragraph.

Sources and further reading

Related records

All records