Simple reading · Open the interactive atlas

Tritheism

Doctrinal Controversy

Orthodox teaching distinguishes the three hypostases without dividing the one divine essence or turning communion into three gods.

Historical context

Tritheism is a recurring danger whenever created categories of three individual beings are applied directly to the Trinity. Historical theologians used the term for different proposals, so the simulator presents it as a diagnostic boundary rather than a single uniform school.

Reception

Orthodox theology describes the one essence and three hypostases within the mystery of the Trinity, without treating the Persons as three separate gods.

Memory hook

Three Persons, one undivided divine nature.

Key points

Common questions

Doctrinal connections

Scripture

Primary sources

John of Damascus writes:

John of Damascus says that personal modes of existence introduce no difference of divine essence or dignity.

all the qualities the Father has are the Son's, save that the Father is unbegotten, and this exception involves no difference in essence nor dignity, but only a different mode of coming into existence.

— John of Damascus, An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith (Book 1, Chapter 8), trans. S.D.F. Salmond

Passage context and translation

John says that the Father's being unbegotten distinguishes the mode of personal existence without introducing a difference of divine essence or dignity between Father and Son.

Before the excerpt

the term 'Only-begotten' because He alone was begotten alone of the Father alone

After the excerpt

These do not differ from each other in nature ... but they differ in the mode of coming into existence.

Salmond translation in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Volume 9; the displayed quotation is the complete sentence in Book I, chapter 8.

Sources and further reading

Related records

All records