Simple reading · Open the interactive atlas

Modalism / Sabellianism

Doctrinal Controversy

Classical Protestant confessions reject modalism and read baptism, prayer, and the gospel as involving the real distinction of Father, Son, and Spirit.

Historical context

Early Christian writers argued against accounts that collapsed the personal distinctions of the God revealed in Scripture. The exact views grouped under 'modalism' were not identical, and the label should be used historically rather than as a casual accusation against contemporary Christians.

Reception

Classical Protestant confessions reject modalism through the Trinitarian shape of Scripture, baptism, prayer, and the ecumenical creeds.

Memory hook

One nature does not mean one personal subject.

Key points

Common questions

Doctrinal connections

Scripture

Primary sources

John of Damascus writes:

John of Damascus distinguishes the Father's unbegotten mode of existence from the Son's without dividing their divine essence.

all the qualities the Father has are the Son's, save that the Father is unbegotten, and this exception involves no difference in essence nor dignity, but only a different mode of coming into existence.

— John of Damascus, An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith (Book 1, Chapter 8), trans. S.D.F. Salmond

Passage context and translation

John says that the Father's being unbegotten distinguishes the mode of personal existence without introducing a difference of divine essence or dignity between Father and Son.

Before the excerpt

the term 'Only-begotten' because He alone was begotten alone of the Father alone

After the excerpt

These do not differ from each other in nature ... but they differ in the mode of coming into existence.

Salmond translation in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Volume 9; the displayed quotation is the complete sentence in Book I, chapter 8.

Sources and further reading

Related records

All records