Simple reading · Open the interactive atlas

Monoenergism

Doctrinal Controversy

Orthodox reception follows Maximus and the Sixth Ecumenical Council in confessing two natural operations in the one incarnate Word.

Historical context

The controversy arose in the seventh century as imperial and ecclesial leaders sought formulas that could reconcile communities divided after Chalcedon. Maximus the Confessor argued that one operation could not adequately express Christ's complete humanity. The Sixth Ecumenical Council's confession of two natural operations was received with the confession of two natural wills.

Reception

Orthodox reception follows Maximus and the Sixth Ecumenical Council in confessing two natural operations in the one incarnate Word.

Memory hook

One Son acts through divine and human operations.

Key points

Common questions

Doctrinal connections

Scripture

Primary sources

The council's definition states:

Constantinople III explicitly confesses two natural operations as well as two natural wills in Christ.

in him are two natural wills and two natural operations

— Third Council of Constantinople, Dogmatic Definition (Definition of Faith, Session XVIII), trans. Henry Percival, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Volume 14

Passage context and translation

The council's Definition of Faith rejects Monothelitism by confessing that Christ's complete divinity and humanity include two natural wills and operations united in his one person. The prior wording in this record came from Pope Agatho's letter earlier on the linked page.

Before the excerpt

defining all this we likewise declare that

After the excerpt

indivisibly, inconvertibly, inseparably, inconfusedly, according to the teaching of the holy Fathers.

Percival translation in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Volume 14; quoted from the Definition of Faith in Session XVIII, not from Agatho's preceding letter.

Sources and further reading

Related records

All records