Simple reading · Open the interactive atlas

Adoptionism

Doctrinal Controversy

Orthodox Christology confesses the eternal Word as the subject of the Incarnation, with complete divine and human natures.

Historical context

Adoptionist proposals appeared in more than one period, including early Christian debates and medieval Latin controversies. They are not identical to Arianism, Docetism, or ordinary language about Christ's public manifestation as Son. The simulator uses the term to test the unity and pre-existence of Christ's identity.

Reception

Orthodox Christology confesses the eternal Word as the one subject of the Incarnation, with no later promotion of a merely human person.

Memory hook

The eternal Son assumes humanity; he is not adopted into divinity.

Key points

Common questions

Doctrinal connections

Scripture

Primary sources

The Nicene creed calls the Son:

Nicaea's consubstantial confession identifies the Son with the Father's divine reality rather than as a merely adopted creature.

being of one substance (ὁμοούσιον, consubstantialem) with the Father

— First Council of Nicaea, Nicene Creed (Creed), trans. Henry Percival, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Volume 14

Passage context and translation

The council uses the term homoousios to confess the Son's full divinity against Arian claims that the Son is a creature.

Before the excerpt

very God of very God, begotten (γεννηθέντα), not made,

After the excerpt

By whom all things were made, both which be in heaven and in earth.

Percival translation in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Volume 14; the excerpt retains the Greek and Latin gloss printed in the linked edition.

Sources and further reading

Related records

All records