Simple reading · Open the interactive atlas

Eunomianism

Doctrinal Controversy

Classical Protestant confessions receive the Nicene claim that the eternal Son is fully God, while grounding its norm in Scripture and the ecumenical creeds.

Historical context

Eunomius wrote in the aftermath of the Nicene controversy and became a leading representative of an anomoian position, meaning 'unlike in essence.' Basil of Caesarea and Gregory of Nyssa responded to his account of divine knowability and the Son's status. The dispute involved both Trinitarian doctrine and the limits of theological language.

Reception

Classical Protestant confessions receive the Nicene claim that the eternal Son is fully God and that God's revelation cannot be reduced to creaturely categories.

Memory hook

The Son is not unlike the Father as a creature is unlike God.

Key points

Common questions

Doctrinal connections

Scripture

Primary sources

John of Damascus writes:

John of Damascus says that the Father's unbegottenness entails neither a difference of essence nor a difference of dignity in the Son.

all the qualities the Father has are the Son's, save that the Father is unbegotten, and this exception involves no difference in essence nor dignity, but only a different mode of coming into existence.

— John of Damascus, An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith (Book 1, Chapter 8), trans. S.D.F. Salmond

Passage context and translation

John says that the Father's being unbegotten distinguishes the mode of personal existence without introducing a difference of divine essence or dignity between Father and Son.

Before the excerpt

the term 'Only-begotten' because He alone was begotten alone of the Father alone

After the excerpt

These do not differ from each other in nature ... but they differ in the mode of coming into existence.

Salmond translation in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Volume 9; the displayed quotation is the complete sentence in Book I, chapter 8.

The Nicene creed calls the Son:

Nicaea confesses the Son as consubstantial with the Father.

being of one substance (ὁμοούσιον, consubstantialem) with the Father

— First Council of Nicaea, Nicene Creed (Creed), trans. Henry Percival, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Volume 14

Passage context and translation

The council uses the term homoousios to confess the Son's full divinity against Arian claims that the Son is a creature.

Before the excerpt

very God of very God, begotten (γεννηθέντα), not made,

After the excerpt

By whom all things were made, both which be in heaven and in earth.

Percival translation in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Volume 14; the excerpt retains the Greek and Latin gloss printed in the linked edition.

Sources and further reading

Related records

All records