Simple reading · Open the interactive atlas

Arianism

Doctrinal Controversy

Classical Protestant confessions retain Nicaea's claim that the eternal Son is fully God; Scripture and the ecumenical creeds remain central witnesses.

Historical context

The dispute intensified after Arius's teaching was challenged by Alexander of Alexandria and Athanasius. Nicaea I (325) answered with homoousios, 'of the same essence,' and rejected the claim that the Son was made. The controversy continued through competing fourth-century creeds until the pro-Nicene settlement associated with Constantinople I (381).

Reception

Classical Protestant confessions inherit the Nicene boundary while treating Scripture as the final norm through which the creed's confession is received.

Memory hook

Begotten is not made: the Son belongs fully to the divine life.

Key points

Common questions

Doctrinal connections

Scripture

Primary sources

The Nicene creed calls the Son:

Nicaea's creed answers creaturely accounts of the Son by confessing him as one in substance with the Father.

being of one substance (ὁμοούσιον, consubstantialem) with the Father

— First Council of Nicaea, Nicene Creed (Creed), trans. Henry Percival, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Volume 14

Passage context and translation

The council uses the term homoousios to confess the Son's full divinity against Arian claims that the Son is a creature.

Before the excerpt

very God of very God, begotten (γεννηθέντα), not made,

After the excerpt

By whom all things were made, both which be in heaven and in earth.

Percival translation in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Volume 14; the excerpt retains the Greek and Latin gloss printed in the linked edition.

Sources and further reading

Related records

All records