Simple reading · Open the interactive atlas

Arian controversy intensifies

Timeline Event · Early fourth century

About this date: Controversy developed over several years.

The dispute about the Son's relation to the Father prompts a wider conciliar response and careful language about the Son's full divinity.

People

Primary sources

Alexander reports the proposition he opposes:

Alexander reports and rejects the claim that the Son once did not exist; the quoted words are his opponents' position.

there was a time when the Son of God was not

— Arius's party (reported and rejected by Alexander of Alexandria), Letter to Alexander of Constantinople (Letter 1, section 2 (in Epistles on Arianism)), trans. James B. H. Hawkins, Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 6

Passage context and translation

Alexander reports the claim of Arius's party here; it is the position he rejects, not Alexander's own confession. He then argues from John 1:1-3 that the Word is not a creature.

Before the excerpt

I have stirred myself up to show you the faithlessness of these men who say that

After the excerpt

and that He who was not before, came into existence afterwards

Hawkins translation in Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 6; this is letter 1, section 2, reporting an opponent's claim.

Sources and further reading

Related records

All records